Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:15 PM
Conflicts
Okay, I've got a situation here. I had a 30 minutes arguement because of this.
It's just another day when I'm sitting right here playing with my laptop
So here goes.
This is just another ordinary math situation but it's driving me crazy
Situation: A 3 people lottery deal
Person A: The sealer
Person B: The middle man
Person C: The buyer
A gave 10 tickets of lotteries worth RM:30(each is RM:3) to
Bbecause
B is friends with
C and that
C wanted lottery ticket.
On deal,
C gave RM:30 to
B in order for B to handover to
AAfter scratching,
C had 2 coupon to be claim from
A worth RM:6
B gave
C RM:6 in cash because there were no extra tickets for
C to claim
Conclusion: Was claimed that
B gave RM:6 to
C because of the
2 coupons that
C has striked. So in total
B is holding up RM:24 cash and RM:6 coupon
and that
B gave out RM:6 to
CWhen
B demand for RM:6 from
A,
A said that why am I suppose to give you RM:6
when you are already holding up the RM:10 that
C gave you earlier?
In conclusion,
B lost RM:6,
A got exactly RM:30 worth of cash and coupon
and
C paid only RM:24. But
B lost RM:6 and when
B said to
C that
actually "I wasn't suppose to pay you the RM:6 and that I paid you extra.
C said that no, you're suppose to pay me RM:6 when I give you RM:10.
CONCLUSION:
A: Receive enough lottery money
B: Lost RM:6
C: Gave RM:30 to
B and received RM:6 from
B beacuse the lottery worth RM:24.
Anyone; what went wrong??
